Sitework in Wisconsin on the same Richmond Metro = 1.00 scale as the rest of DirtBid: 16 cost regions and 72 counties, each with a soil-risk rating from USDA and USGS data. Minneapolis Metro (Wisconsin side) runs highest at 1.06×; Duluth Metro (Wisconsin side) lowest at 0.84×.
Wisconsin multipliers and county ratings are planning-level: built from federal price and soil data, and not yet checked against local bids or a local estimator.
Cost regions
16
Counties in the model
72
Richmond Metro baseline
1.00×
Milwaukee Metro
0.95×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Hochheim, Ozaukee, Casco
4 counties in this region. 3 of 4 rate high for water table. 3 of 4 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Milwaukee County (5 of 10).
Counties: Milwaukee County, Ozaukee County, Washington County, Waukesha County
Rest of Wisconsin
0.91×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Plainfield, Freeon, Seaton
45 counties in this region. 34 of 45 rate high for water table. 30 of 45 rate high for dewatering. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 3 of the 45. Deep frost protection is likely in 11 of 45. Highest risk score: Ashland County (7 of 10).
Counties: Adams County, Ashland County, Barron County, Bayfield County, Buffalo County, Burnett County, Clark County, Crawford County, Dodge County, Door County, Dunn County, Florence County, Forest County, Grant County, Green Lake County, Iron County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Juneau County, Lafayette County, Langlade County, Lincoln County, Manitowoc County, Marinette County, Marquette County, Menominee County, Monroe County, Oneida County, Pepin County, Polk County, Portage County, Price County, Richland County, Rusk County, Sauk County, Sawyer County, Shawano County, Taylor County, Trempealeau County, Vilas County, Walworth County, Washburn County, Waupaca County, Waushara County, Wood County
Madison Metro
0.95×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Plano, Newglarus, Dodgeville
4 counties in this region. 1 of 4 rate high for shallow rock. 1 of 4 rate high for water table. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 1 of the 4. Highest risk score: Columbia County (5 of 10).
Counties: Columbia County, Dane County, Green County, Iowa County
Green Bay Metro
0.90×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Oshkosh, Manawa
3 counties in this region. 3 of 3 rate high for water table. 3 of 3 rate high for dewatering. Deep frost protection is likely in 1 of 3. Highest risk score: Oconto County (6 of 10).
Counties: Brown County, Kewaunee County, Oconto County
Appleton Metro
0.89×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Manawa, Hochheim
2 counties in this region. 2 of 2 rate high for water table. 2 of 2 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Outagamie County (6 of 10).
Counties: Calumet County, Outagamie County
Racine Metro
0.94×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Ozaukee, Ashkum, Elliott
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Racine County (5 of 10).
Counties: Racine County
Eau Claire Metro
0.89×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Newot, Spencer, Menahga
2 counties in this region. 2 of 2 rate high for water table. 1 of 2 rate high for dewatering. Deep frost protection is likely in 1 of 2. Highest risk score: Chippewa County (6 of 10).
Counties: Chippewa County, Eau Claire County
Oshkosh Metro
0.90×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Manawa, Hortonville
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Winnebago County (5 of 10).
Counties: Winnebago County
Kenosha Metro
1.01×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Ozaukee, Ashkum, Markham
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Kenosha County (5 of 10).
Counties: Kenosha County
Janesville Metro
0.91×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Kidder, Plano, Warsaw
1 county in this region. Highest risk score: Rock County (5 of 10).
Counties: Rock County
La Crosse Metro
0.88×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Seaton, Dorerton, Churchtown
2 counties in this region. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 1 of the 2. Highest risk score: Vernon County (5 of 10).
Counties: La Crosse County, Vernon County
Minneapolis Metro (Wisconsin side)
1.06×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Hersey, Seaton, Vlasaty
2 counties in this region. 1 of 2 rate high for water table. Highest risk score: St. Croix County (5 of 10).
Counties: Pierce County, St. Croix County
Wausau Metro
0.89×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Withee, Loyal, Rietbrock
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for undercut. Deep frost protection is likely in 1 of 1. Highest risk score: Marathon County (7 of 10).
Counties: Marathon County
Sheboygan Metro
0.91×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Hochheim, Casco
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Sheboygan County (5 of 10).
Counties: Sheboygan County
Fond du Lac Metro
0.88×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Lomira, Pella, Theresa
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Fond du Lac County (5 of 10).
Counties: Fond du Lac County
Duluth Metro (Wisconsin side)
0.84×Cost multiplier
Dominant ground: Rubicon, Amnicon, Cuttre
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for undercut. Highest risk score: Douglas County (6 of 10).
Counties: Douglas County
FAQ
Wisconsin Cost Questions
Which soil problems drive sitework cost in Wisconsin?
From USDA soil survey data, the most common across the state: water table (53 of 72 counties rate high), dewatering (47 of 72 counties rate high), undercut (11 of 72 counties rate high). A parcel can differ from its county, so read the survey for your exact site.
Where do the Wisconsin multipliers come from?
From the Commerce Department's Regional Price Parities, on the same Richmond Metro = 1.00 scale as Virginia. Across 29 reviewed regions that method missed by about 0.03 on average. They have not been checked against executed bids in Wisconsin, so use them for planning, not a final bid.
How reliable are the Wisconsin county ratings?
They are screening ratings from federal soil and geology data, not a local estimator's review and not a geotechnical report. Tested against 511 reviewed counties, they land within one level most of the time, and exact matches are less common. Get borings before you price a real site.
Soil Report
See what's under your Wisconsin parcel
A $350 DirtBid AI Soil Report reads the official USDA survey for your exact parcel, flags the hazards above, and prices the risk — before you buy land or sign a contract.