THE DIRTBID REGIONAL MODEL · WISCONSIN

Wisconsin Sitework Costs, Region by Region

Sitework in Wisconsin on the same Richmond Metro = 1.00 scale as the rest of DirtBid: 16 cost regions and 72 counties, each with a soil-risk rating from USDA and USGS data. Minneapolis Metro (Wisconsin side) runs highest at 1.06×; Duluth Metro (Wisconsin side) lowest at 0.84×.

Wisconsin multipliers and county ratings are planning-level: built from federal price and soil data, and not yet checked against local bids or a local estimator.

Cost regions
16
Counties in the model
72
Richmond Metro baseline
1.00×

Milwaukee Metro

0.95×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Hochheim, Ozaukee, Casco

4 counties in this region. 3 of 4 rate high for water table. 3 of 4 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Milwaukee County (5 of 10).

Counties: Milwaukee County, Ozaukee County, Washington County, Waukesha County

Rest of Wisconsin

0.91×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Plainfield, Freeon, Seaton

45 counties in this region. 34 of 45 rate high for water table. 30 of 45 rate high for dewatering. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 3 of the 45. Deep frost protection is likely in 11 of 45. Highest risk score: Ashland County (7 of 10).

Counties: Adams County, Ashland County, Barron County, Bayfield County, Buffalo County, Burnett County, Clark County, Crawford County, Dodge County, Door County, Dunn County, Florence County, Forest County, Grant County, Green Lake County, Iron County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Juneau County, Lafayette County, Langlade County, Lincoln County, Manitowoc County, Marinette County, Marquette County, Menominee County, Monroe County, Oneida County, Pepin County, Polk County, Portage County, Price County, Richland County, Rusk County, Sauk County, Sawyer County, Shawano County, Taylor County, Trempealeau County, Vilas County, Walworth County, Washburn County, Waupaca County, Waushara County, Wood County

Madison Metro

0.95×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Plano, Newglarus, Dodgeville

4 counties in this region. 1 of 4 rate high for shallow rock. 1 of 4 rate high for water table. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 1 of the 4. Highest risk score: Columbia County (5 of 10).

Counties: Columbia County, Dane County, Green County, Iowa County

Green Bay Metro

0.90×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Oshkosh, Manawa

3 counties in this region. 3 of 3 rate high for water table. 3 of 3 rate high for dewatering. Deep frost protection is likely in 1 of 3. Highest risk score: Oconto County (6 of 10).

Counties: Brown County, Kewaunee County, Oconto County

Appleton Metro

0.89×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Manawa, Hochheim

2 counties in this region. 2 of 2 rate high for water table. 2 of 2 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Outagamie County (6 of 10).

Counties: Calumet County, Outagamie County

Racine Metro

0.94×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Ozaukee, Ashkum, Elliott

1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Racine County (5 of 10).

Counties: Racine County

Eau Claire Metro

0.89×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Newot, Spencer, Menahga

2 counties in this region. 2 of 2 rate high for water table. 1 of 2 rate high for dewatering. Deep frost protection is likely in 1 of 2. Highest risk score: Chippewa County (6 of 10).

Counties: Chippewa County, Eau Claire County

Oshkosh Metro

0.90×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Manawa, Hortonville

1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Winnebago County (5 of 10).

Counties: Winnebago County

Kenosha Metro

1.01×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Ozaukee, Ashkum, Markham

1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Kenosha County (5 of 10).

Counties: Kenosha County

Janesville Metro

0.91×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Kidder, Plano, Warsaw

1 county in this region. Highest risk score: Rock County (5 of 10).

Counties: Rock County

La Crosse Metro

0.88×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Seaton, Dorerton, Churchtown

2 counties in this region. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 1 of the 2. Highest risk score: Vernon County (5 of 10).

Counties: La Crosse County, Vernon County

Minneapolis Metro (Wisconsin side)

1.06×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Hersey, Seaton, Vlasaty

2 counties in this region. 1 of 2 rate high for water table. Highest risk score: St. Croix County (5 of 10).

Counties: Pierce County, St. Croix County

Wausau Metro

0.89×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Withee, Loyal, Rietbrock

1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for undercut. Deep frost protection is likely in 1 of 1. Highest risk score: Marathon County (7 of 10).

Counties: Marathon County

Sheboygan Metro

0.91×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Kewaunee, Hochheim, Casco

1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Sheboygan County (5 of 10).

Counties: Sheboygan County

Fond du Lac Metro

0.88×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Lomira, Pella, Theresa

1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for dewatering. Highest risk score: Fond du Lac County (5 of 10).

Counties: Fond du Lac County

Duluth Metro (Wisconsin side)

0.84×Cost multiplier

Dominant ground: Rubicon, Amnicon, Cuttre

1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for undercut. Highest risk score: Douglas County (6 of 10).

Counties: Douglas County

FAQ

Wisconsin Cost Questions

Which soil problems drive sitework cost in Wisconsin?

From USDA soil survey data, the most common across the state: water table (53 of 72 counties rate high), dewatering (47 of 72 counties rate high), undercut (11 of 72 counties rate high). A parcel can differ from its county, so read the survey for your exact site.

Where do the Wisconsin multipliers come from?

From the Commerce Department's Regional Price Parities, on the same Richmond Metro = 1.00 scale as Virginia. Across 29 reviewed regions that method missed by about 0.03 on average. They have not been checked against executed bids in Wisconsin, so use them for planning, not a final bid.

How reliable are the Wisconsin county ratings?

They are screening ratings from federal soil and geology data, not a local estimator's review and not a geotechnical report. Tested against 511 reviewed counties, they land within one level most of the time, and exact matches are less common. Get borings before you price a real site.

Soil Report

See what's under your Wisconsin parcel

A $350 DirtBid AI Soil Report reads the official USDA survey for your exact parcel, flags the hazards above, and prices the risk — before you buy land or sign a contract.