Greenville Metro
Dominant ground: Cecil, Hiwassee, Pacolet
4 counties in this region. Highest risk score: Greenville County (4 of 10).
Counties: Anderson County, Greenville County, Laurens County, Pickens County
THE DIRTBID REGIONAL MODEL · SOUTH CAROLINA
Sitework in South Carolina on the same Richmond Metro = 1.00 scale as the rest of DirtBid: 11 cost regions and 46 counties, each with a soil-risk rating from USDA and USGS data. Charleston Metro runs highest at 1.00×; Florence Metro lowest at 0.81×.
South Carolina multipliers and county ratings are planning-level: built from federal price and soil data, and not yet checked against local bids or a local estimator.
Dominant ground: Cecil, Hiwassee, Pacolet
4 counties in this region. Highest risk score: Greenville County (4 of 10).
Counties: Anderson County, Greenville County, Laurens County, Pickens County
Dominant ground: Lakeland, Troup, Ailey
6 counties in this region. 1 of 6 rate high for water table. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 3 of the 6. Highest risk score: Richland County (6 of 10).
Counties: Calhoun County, Fairfield County, Kershaw County, Lexington County, Richland County, Saluda County
Dominant ground: Goldsboro, Meggett, Eulonia
3 counties in this region. 3 of 3 rate high for water table. 3 of 3 rate high for undercut. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 2 of the 3. Highest risk score: Berkeley County (6 of 10).
Counties: Berkeley County, Charleston County, Dorchester County
Dominant ground: Cecil, Rains, Goldsboro
20 counties in this region. 14 of 20 rate high for water table. 12 of 20 rate high for dewatering. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 13 of the 20. Highest risk score: Colleton County (7 of 10).
Counties: Abbeville County, Allendale County, Bamberg County, Barnwell County, Cherokee County, Chesterfield County, Clarendon County, Colleton County, Dillon County, Georgetown County, Greenwood County, Hampton County, Lee County, McCormick County, Marion County, Marlboro County, Newberry County, Oconee County, Orangeburg County, Williamsburg County
Dominant ground: Cecil, Georgeville, Wilkes
3 counties in this region. Highest risk score: Chester County (4 of 10).
Counties: Chester County, Lancaster County, York County
Dominant ground: Johnston, Woodington, Pocomoke
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for undercut. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of it. Highest risk score: Horry County (6 of 10).
Counties: Horry County
Dominant ground: Cecil, Pacolet, Bethlehem
2 counties in this region. Highest risk score: Spartanburg County (4 of 10).
Counties: Spartanburg County, Union County
Dominant ground: Bohicket, Capers, Lakeland
2 counties in this region. 2 of 2 rate high for water table. 2 of 2 rate high for undercut. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 2 of the 2. Highest risk score: Beaufort County (7 of 10).
Counties: Beaufort County, Jasper County
Dominant ground: Troup, Lakeland, Vaucluse
2 counties in this region. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 1 of the 2. Highest risk score: Aiken County (4 of 10).
Counties: Aiken County, Edgefield County
Dominant ground: Goldsboro, Noboco, Norfolk
2 counties in this region. 2 of 2 rate high for water table. 2 of 2 rate high for dewatering. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of 2 of the 2. Highest risk score: Florence County (6 of 10). This multiplier sits outside the range the model was tested on, so treat it as rougher.
Counties: Darlington County, Florence County
Dominant ground: Rains, Norfolk, Lynchburg
1 county in this region. 1 of 1 rate high for water table. 1 of 1 rate high for undercut. USGS maps karst-prone rock across much of it. Highest risk score: Sumter County (6 of 10).
Counties: Sumter County
FAQ
From USDA soil survey data, the most common across the state: water table (24 of 46 counties rate high), dewatering (21 of 46 counties rate high), undercut (15 of 46 counties rate high). A parcel can differ from its county, so read the survey for your exact site.
From the Commerce Department's Regional Price Parities, on the same Richmond Metro = 1.00 scale as Virginia. Across 29 reviewed regions that method missed by about 0.03 on average. They have not been checked against executed bids in South Carolina, so use them for planning, not a final bid.
They are screening ratings from federal soil and geology data, not a local estimator's review and not a geotechnical report. Tested against 511 reviewed counties, they land within one level most of the time, and exact matches are less common. Get borings before you price a real site.
Soil Report
A $350 DirtBid AI Soil Report reads the official USDA survey for your exact parcel, flags the hazards above, and prices the risk — before you buy land or sign a contract.